Water filters for the entire house take the hassle out of getting clean drinking water. You just need to turn on any faucet in your home without any worries, fill a glass with guaranteed clean H2O, sit back and enjoy.
That’s why it’s critical to select a dependable, cost-effective whole house water filter. Aquasana and Pelican are most popular brands, and will be covered in this article today.
Brand Overview – Aquasana vs Pelican
Aquasana is a Texas-based firm that has built a remarkable reputation for their incredibly strong water filters, which often go above and above the criteria for safe, good-tasting water throughout many years of operation. Salt-free softening solutions and cost-effective techniques to limit the presence of microorganisms in drinking water are among the unique filtration methods created by the firm and exclusively accessible in their products. Aquasana’s whole product line is committed to ecologically responsible manufacturing, including reusable outer filter casings and recyclable cartridges.
Pelican Water originates from Florida, is a small yet popular, water filtration brand owned by the company, Pentair. Pelican is a customer-focused company that offers a variety of filtration choices to suit different families and water sources. As part of this commitment, every Pelican system is built to be easy to install. Dive into the below content to understand the difference of Aquasana vs Pelican whole house filter.
Aquasana vs Pelican – Comparison
1. Filtering Technology
A four-stage filter is used in both the Pelican PC600 and Aquasana OptimH20 whole-house filtration systems to provide consistently clean water for every faucet and appliance. They start with a pre-screen, like practically all in-line filters, to catch bigger particles and sediments that might harm the rest of the filter. The Aquasana has a distinct advantage here, since it can remove particles as small as 1 micrometer, compared to 5 microns for the Pelican.
Using the Aquasana as an example, stage two consists of a carbon block filtration system with a very dense architecture capable of reducing levels of lead, cysts, PFOA/PFOS, chlorine, and other organic pollutants. Despite the fact that two of the Pelican’s stages are carbon-based filters as well, it falls short of the OptimH2O in this area, focusing solely on organic pollutants.
A water conditioner and a UV filter are the final filtering stages in the Aquasana whole home filter, ensuring that water is soft and bacteria-free. While the Pelican has an antibacterial copper and zinc KDF layer, it still falls short of the Aquasana when it comes to filtration technology.
2. Value for Money and User Experience
The Aquasana OptimH2O and the Pelican PC600 both provide an excellent user experience, albeit in slightly different ways. The Pelican focuses on longevity, reducing the amount of redundant time spent for adjusting the system while the Aquasana is highly accessible and user-friendly, and comes with LED indicators to display flow rate as well as remaining filter life.
In this regard, the Pelican comes out on top. While both modes are available in a variety of combinations and capacity sizes, the Pelican comes out on top due to its bigger capacity per filter and quicker flow rate, which means you’ll notice less of a performance loss after installation.
Those who have previously purchased the Pelican have observed a difference in a variety of applications, ranging from more enjoyable bathing to scale-free appliances. The Pelican’s capacity to remove 97 percent chlorine up to 1.301 million gallons is the reason for this.
3. Certifications and Contaminants Minimized
The Aquasana has been tested and certified by the IAPMO to decrease more lead than any other whole home filter available, which is a huge matter considering that lead pipes are still in use throughout large swaths of the US. Its UV screen can also destroy 99.99 percent of diseases and germs, including cryptosporidium and giardia, according to the manufacturer.
The Pelican PC600 just cannot compete with the Aquasana in terms of pollutant removal due to its less extensive filtration stages. However, not every home requires such sophisticated filtering. The pelican will be sufficient for individuals who merely want to remove sediment, chlorine, organic compounds, and trace heavy metals from their water source.
Final Verdict
The fact is that each of these pitchers is well worth your money, and their little discrepancies are often balanced out when the overall picture is considered.
However, if we had to pick one, we’d prefer the Pelican PC600. We also believe it provides the finest long-term value of any pitcher filter without reducing filter performance.
However, if we were looking for a whole-house filter for non-average air, we’d probably go with the Pelican PC600.
Salman is a prolific environmental writer, and has authored more than 500 articles in reputed journals, magazines and websites. He is proactively engaged in creating mass awareness on renewable energy, waste management, sustainability and conservation all over the world.
Salman can be reached on salman@cleantechloops.com
- The Importance of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Various Industries - April 6, 2024
- The Benefits of Renting a Private House - April 2, 2024
- How to Ensure Great Product Quality When Starting a Small Business - April 1, 2024